Field Report

Vail & Summit County - CO

2024/11/26
Lat: 39.564, Lon: -105.875
Backcountry Area: Vail & Summit County
Author: Andrew McWilliams
Organization: Forecaster, CAIC

Report Information

Observation Summary

I observed a reactive snowpack and easily made small avalanches on steep slopes below treeline on easterly-facing slopes. These slides acted more like Persistent Slab avalanches than Storm Slab avalanches as they were triggered remotely and sympathetically. The weight of the storm snow made the snowpack reactive, but it was breaking into older weak snow where I traveled. With additional snow in the forecast tonight, expect conditions to remain dangerous for the next couple of days at least.

Area Description

Glacier Peak near the town of Montezuma.

Route Description

I parked at the Deer Creek Trailhead and ascended old mining roads just below the north ridge of Glacier Peak. I followed the ridge to the summit and then descended low-angle, easterly slopes back to the road and followed the road back to the car.

Avalanches

Triggered avalanche

I triggered multiple small avalanches on steep tailings piles with unsupported conex rollovers.

i
Expand to see more details
Date # Elev Asp Type Trig SizeR SizeD Problem Type Location
11/26/2024
2 <TL NE SS AS/r R1 D1 Persistent Slab
11/26/2024
1 <TL NE SS AS/c R1 D1 Persistent Slab
11/26/2024
1 <TL E SS AS/y R1 D1 Persistent Slab

Snowpack

Cracking: Moderate
Collapsing: Minor

When I started hiking there was about 10 inches of storm snow on the ground. By the time I left the field there was over a foot. I observed cracking on nearly every steep slope I encountered while ascending northeast and east-facing slopes, but surprisingly few collapses given how reactive the snowpack was. I was able to trigger multiple avalanches failing at the interface of the basal facets and the storm snow. Where I traveled and dug snowpits there was a surprising lack of midpack layers in the snow. I wonder if there had been a thicker midpack, if the avalanches would have run on a different interface. That said, I triggered one test slope by skiing along the edge of the slope and that slide sympathetically released another one. On my way back to the car, I remotely triggered two more steep slopes by just approaching the rollover at the top. All of the slides were small in size. In snowpits, there was no surprise that I got a propagating result after six taps from the wrist at the basal facet interface in an Extended Column Test (ECT). I also consistently had a result within the storm snow in ECTs, but these were non-propagating. With additional snow overnight, that layer could become an issue as well. However, it seems likely that almost any avalanche in this area would step down to basal facets. I did not observe above treeline due to bad visibility, but I got a surprising lack of avalanche activity as I ascended the ridge and easily kicked off large pieces of cornice. I think the light winds were not efficiently loading snow onto the slopes below me. That said, the slopes below me also lacked consistent steepness and lose what little they have quickly - that was likely the bigger contributing factor. Either way, I wouldn't have skied any steep slopes facing an easterly (or northerly) direction today at any elevation. I didn't look at west or south-facing slopes on my tour.

Weather

Snow all day with light winds and temperatures in the 20s. About 3 or 4 inches of snow was on my car when I returned from the field.

Observation Media Uploads